Viewing entries in
Shadow Work

The Importance of Darkness

Comment

The Importance of Darkness

(I wrote this a few years ago after a mediation I went through with someone in another community)

Whenever we witness a conflict between two people, one of the most difficult things to do is to establish what is actually happening between them.

Mostly, it’s impossible.

You might be unlucky enough to speak to one person first and hear them speak of the other person in the most demonizing ways they can. And this will play into any biases you already have about any group they might appear to be a part of.

What happens when the person being demonized is a man? How easy is it to perceive them according to the new narratives emerging about them? About us?

I’ve spent 30 years digging deep into myself around this, from the time I was with my first and second girlfriend, both having been assaulted and abused by men. And during these years, I explored not only the ways there might be such a dangerous man inside of me, but also the ways he might be inside of other men.

30 years of exploring my own misandry.

Because yes, we men are capable of such things.

But not because we are men.

Over the years, I learned that violence, awfulness, and abuse are not just the domain of men, they are the domain of humans.

And women are just as capable of such things. It may look different, but there’s no less primal and tribal capacity for such things in them. Not that the current narrative about women would allow you to see this. No, patriarchy is all about men… and those who raised them. Right?

Everyone can be awful. Or awful to each other. And the more I explore the nature of conflict, the more I realize this. Whatever the reasons are--self-preservation, safety, reason, protection, morality, purpose, etc--we are capable of exacting really awful things on each other even while we believe we are doing good or well or right or simply the best we can.

The mistake we make is to believe we have risen above this limbic pit.

We haven’t.

All I can say is this: conflict arises when we can’t find a better way, when we don’t understand, when we’re mislead, when we’re unable to really get what’s happening on the other side. So we make assumptions. We judge. We call out. We dismiss. We hate. We demonize. We abandon all hope and throw away the key.

And the result is, we go deeper into our judgment that the other person is *so* other that they are no longer allowed to exist. Or be. Or have their own life where they get to find their way back to the light from whatever dark mess they found themselves in. From whatever mess WE found ourselves in.

Because we aren’t any better. At one point or another we have been or will be in the same place, where others will demonize us and say they are correct about our demon blood, and we’ll hopefully remember that this--their view--is just a small window into our world, that there’s a whole lot more to us than they believe. And if we’ve been in the muck before, we’ll just thank them, acknowledge our darkness, and ask them to show us their demons.

And we’ll finally see each other as we hate each other.

But if we don’t kill each other then, there will be one more step. The impossible step.

Hate and love--or at least compassion, understanding, and generosity-- aren’t that different from one another, but it’s a bit of a mind and heart fuck. It’s available when we know their darkness and our darkness isn’t that different even though it is unique and personal. Their suffering and our suffering. Their shadows and our shadows.

This is why the path of mediation works.

Because it allows us to go beyond the competition of “what happened” into the messy reality of how it felt, how it messed with us, and of how it happened in the first place if the mystery of it isn’t so deep in our shadows that we can bear to feel into the truth of who we were and probably still are in it.

Because the path of mediation is a path of intimacy with those we would rather keep separate from us.

Because the path of mediation is a path back to our own inner monster.

To connect with him and to get to know him a bit better. So that he no longers drives us.

So that we can finally work together and integrate him.

Comment

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

Comment

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

believe, and are now looking for ways to test their new toy.

So what do you do about this?

Don't walk into the trap. It's only for you if you get caught. 

Add "It is my personal opinion that..." in front of their meme to understand that it's not objective truth. 

Also many memes assume something to be true just because it's in the meme, so if you show up and speak otherwise, you just became the target audience for the "denier" of the meme, which will then expose you to a similar trap.

Take a look at the second meme, which, when spelled out, looks like this:

"If you need an illustration of white privilege (ie you're one of those people who need it), and don't think you have privilege, then you needing this illustration is your white privilege talking (and it might also show your fragility for good measure)."

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability  and Avoid Conflict

Comment

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability and Avoid Conflict

(Note: In this conversation I will use responsibility to also mean accountability)

For this game we take a whole new look at the conversation around the topic of Responsibility and its role in conflict. Clear your mind of what you know and dive in.

In relationship or any engagement between adults, responsibility is usually something that is shared (to some degree) between all parties involved.

Imagine responsibility as something that can be measured in terms of “quantity”. When responsibility is taken for everything that happens in the engagement/relationship, everyone knows the part they play and to what degree they affect the outcome. Generally, this means everyone is happy in the engagement and there's little conflict: I cook, you do the dishes. You want more touch, you tell me and I respond with more touch. I drive and you navigate. If I'm unhappy, I share with you about it and you know where you can rise up because it's your responsibility. Or you can refuse and I can take responsibility.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

An experience of “LOVEBOMBING” and withdrawal, from the point of view of a “narcissist”

Comment

An experience of “LOVEBOMBING” and withdrawal, from the point of view of a “narcissist”

Note: I use the word “narcissist” as an illustration only, not as a definition for someone. This post is more related to avoidant attachment style)

Someone comes into my field, we connect, and I feel immense love for them. I express this love with an open heart… We share a period of deep Communion, sometimes nearly soul shattering!

As the days go on… I find it more and more difficult to continue giving love and affection at this level… It isn’t sustainable. I am just one person, and their need begins to feel like a deep well.

I have always refilled my own cup by spending time alone…withdrawing from the world. Giving myself the love and attention I need.

Click the title to read more.

Comment

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

Comment

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

I think the quote below is great.

And, it fails to acknowledge the deep need many people have to be chosen, to be someone else's top choice.

Some say "I choose myself first" and fair enough, they do, and everyone else comes second.

Some choose (or nature does) their child(ren).

Some choose their pet.

Some choose their partner.

Some choose each moment, each engagement, each bite of food they ingest.

We forget the power of choosing and being chosen.

(click the title to read more)

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 2

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached Part 2

Sobriety in the Spike & The Two Transformations

The central point of the first “Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached” was this: anxious attachers are wired up to have stronger feelings (sooner) and to bond deeper (faster) in the beginning of a new relationship. They also tend to rush into lots and lots of intimacy, which means that the need for consistency and security is probably going to come online sooner for them than it will for their lover — which is likely going to be more than that person (or the relationship) are ready for.

A lot of these responses are baked into the nervous system, so it really isn’t a matter of stopping it from happening. Rather, it’s about learning to maintain a degree of mindfulness while it is happening — just enough so that you can make different kinds of choices. I call it “Sobriety in the Spike.”

The “Spike” is that initial stage of relationship where you can’t stop thinking about them, where you’re willing the time to pass until you can see them again, where being with them is the most intoxicatingly pleasurable thing you can possibly imagine. It’s a surge of hormones and neurotransmitters that are doing precisely what they were evolutionarily designed to do. Thing is, the Spike isn’t “like” drugs, it IS drugs, and there are some highly predictable ways that they will distort your perception of reality and compel you do all kinds of things you wouldn’t ordinarily do.
(click the title to read more)

Comment

He has such great genetics!

Comment

He has such great genetics!

A baby boy is born to a young mother and a father, and his father sees that “his hands are almost as big as his head!” He thinks to himself, “yeah, he’s got my genetics.”

The mother and father have come from homes that do not talk about weakness, only success and accomplishment. He loses his cool one day and begins to hit his wife while she takes the punches with one arm and shields the infant boy with the other from the violence. The baby’s mind is soaking in all this unconsciously, and he learns implicitly that the world isn’t safe...little does he know the father also beat her when she was pregnant with him as well. Each event releases excess cortisol within that infant, hindering healthy brain development and setting the stage for perceiving the world as a dangerous place. ...but we all know in this small town that this baby will be okay. After all, “he has such great genetics!”

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Antiracism and the Problem of Blue-Stage Morality

Comment

Antiracism and the Problem of Blue-Stage Morality

Recently, with the riots in response to the gratuitous killings of black civilians Breyonna Taylor and George Floyd, as well as many others, the ideology of antiracism has gained monumental popularity.

Antiracism calls for vigilance in the personal, interpersonal, and interobjective spaces, encouraging individuals to interrupt racism when they see it and combat any racist ‘microagressions’ or behaviours within themselves.

The problem with antiracism is that while it looks noble on paper, in practice it has the potential to become as damaging as it’s nemesis. This is because:

1) It redefines racism as a ‘system of oppression’ as a means of determining who can and cannot be racist and experience racism (which is untrue and ultimately ends up being divisive);
2) It advocates for discriminatory policies that redistribute privileges under the guise of seeking to combat them;
3) It does not account for how the somatic nature of trauma from past racism influences currently experienced racism;
4) It seeks to destroy racism using an outdated and ineffective archetypal framework of morality.

In this article, I will deal with the first problem and address the other three in separate pieces, for the sake of keeping things easy, digestible and concise (because who the fuck reads anymore? Not me).

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

The Phases of Security

Comment

The Phases of Security

The above is an amazing breakdown of the phases/stages of the journey to secure. I'm paraphrasing here but it generally follows as such...

1. Unconscious Insecurity
2. Conscious Insecurity
3. Conscious Security
4. Unconscious Security

And its REEEEAALLY important to know where you land when engaging with others.

What does this mean?

If you're at level 1 and 2, you are almost certainly still a slave to your attachment wounds and reactions.

At level 1, unconscious insecurity, you don't even know how insecure you are. You are literally unaware of the wound, and unaware of how these wounds effect your behavior. This means you are almost certainly REACTIVE vs. RESPONSIVE. This means the stories and beliefs your attachment wound has created are running the show, and its likely you'll be triggered by anything or anyone who hits your pain points in just the right way. You will be an endless train of emotional reaction.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Your Work is Your Responsibility

Comment

Your Work is Your Responsibility

(this article was originally posted by Nile Abasi on June 5, 2020)

I have a lot to say about the events occurring in the world right now -- much of which is contrary to any political agenda or 'correctness'. I believe some of what I have to say will be confronting to many, and if I'm honest part of me is afraid of being crucified for going against the grain of my primary liberal community but ultimately -- I am more committed to living truthfully and being honest than I am to being liked (although I have to admit, I do like it when you like me).

For those of you who don't know I'm the product of a biracial lesbian couple conceived in the heart of the nineties (close to the times of the Rodney King riots).

One of my mom's (my birth mom) is a white woman with blonde hair and blue eyes from Shaker Heights Ohio, and my other mom is a black woman from South Central LA (Compton). From birth I was raised and influenced by two completely opposing cultural backgrounds.

My biological father was a sperm donor. He is a black man I know very little about other than he was studying to become a lawyer, had high cheekbones and a nice smile.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

The Superpowers of Insecure Attachment Styles

Comment

The Superpowers of Insecure Attachment Styles

(this was originally posted on the Attachment Community Facebook Group)

I’ve recently been seeing many people commenting on Dismissive Avoidants (DAs) not caring about emotions, and being completely indifferent to processing anything with their partners. I just wanted to provide my own view of this, in the hopes that this might provide another dimension of understanding here.

Superpowers emerge when we go into the places where the insecurities of our attachment systems (the most sensitive parts) have over-compensated to survive, and we begin healing these parts of ourselves. We uncover the power in the deep sensitivity of these areas, and then allow the richness of wisdom here to flow through our lives.

So, while the Anxious attacher's superpower is in the realm of empathy and the Avoidant attacher's is about intellectual understanding, the Disorganized attacher's superpowers are all about somatic/primal awareness.

We’ll cover all three here.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

The Challenge of Emotionally Balancing with Others

2 Comments

The Challenge of Emotionally Balancing with Others

Trying to emotionally balance on someone who is trying to do the same thing with you will usually lead to a very challenging balancing act.

This is normal.

Ever seen two acrobats balancing on each other? There’s usually a “base” and a “flyer”. There’s never two bases or two flyers balancing on each other.

The same is true emotionally with two people. It’s always much wiser to have a base (the most emotionally balanced partner) and a flyer (the person exploring their emotions) at any one time.

For three people, you’ll notice that in a counseling/therapy situation, the practitioner will always be a version of a “base” and the partners will either be a combination of base/flyer or flyer/flyer.

In other words, it’s CRUCIAL that there be enough balance in the system (either using at least one partner or one practitioner as the base) for a volatile/challenging situation to not become too dangerous.

Again, same as with partner acrobatics.

(click the title to read the rest)

2 Comments

Growing a More Secure Attachment Style

Comment

Growing a More Secure Attachment Style

Essentially growing a more secure attachment style comes down to create a stable life with stable relationships as well as increasing your inner stability through practices that support it:

- embodied practice (yoga/meditation/exercise)
- reducing addictive behavior (drugs/coffee/porn/etc)
- reducing clutter/distractions
- increasing self-esteem (the book "The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem" is great and has practices in it too)

Also you can look at increasing stability in 7 different areas:

- Physical (good/enough sleep/food/water/exercise)
- Spiritual (good/enough meditation, prayer, ritual)
- Somatic (good/enough movement, dance, etc practice that involve the 4 pillars of embodiment: touch, movement, sound, breath)
- Emotional (good/enough solid/secure/fulfilling/supportive/connection with friends/family/mentors/allies who are themselves preferably secure. Therapy is an example of a secure relationship with mentorship)
- Social (good/enough interactions with peers/community that make you feel connected to the world so you don’t isolate)
- Primal (good/enough engagements with nature and the world that allow you to feel and feed your inner animal)
- Intellectual (good/enough reading/conversations/learning that allow you to know yourself and others better over time)

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Narcissism

Comment

Narcissism

There are many great insights to be found in understanding the points in this video. However, I am continually concerned about this “pathology-focused” narrative we all seem to gravitate toward in this culture.

“What’s wrong with...fill in the blank.” We often find ourselves looking for what’s wrong with others, with ourselves, with the world. What about what’s right? What can we learn from our experiences? What can we learn from the perspectives different from our own?

I can guarantee that in the future we will look back on this time of focusing on “pathology” and what is “wrong with people” as a symptom of severe disconnection with our collective humanity.

Take the point casually mentioned in this video about making sure not to label a child a narcissist, because self-focus is a critical part of our development as human beings. What about those who missed critical parts of their development? Is it not an obvious correlation to make that adults who show these traits simply missed critical development as children? Is it not obvious that those who have less privileges of wealth, security, healthy role models, education, and reassurance will have some of these traits because they display more traits of survival?

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Gaslighting: Intent Or Impact?

Comment

Gaslighting: Intent Or Impact?

Originally, it appears that gaslighting was defined as how someone is INTENT on "manipulating (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity." It came from the British play "Gas Light" along with two movie adaptions named "Gaslight".

But then in order to determine something to be gaslighting, this means you have to KNOW the INTENT of the person doing it, which is much easier to assume than verify.

In recent years, there's been an arising new definition of gaslighting which seems to be about IMPACT, in line with a desire to validate feelings and experiences of those who identify as victims which have otherwise been dismissed, denied, or silenced. This would work out great if the intent of this was strictly to validate someone’s experience. However, it appears that the definition has evolved to become some version of equating IMPACT and INTENT, ie "If I feel gaslighted (IMPACT), it means you are gaslighting me (INTENT)". The problem is, since it's obvious intent isn't always present, a new expression has arisen: "accidental gaslighting", implying that someone can be gaslighting someone else without intending it. Unfortunately, this also means that INTENT no longer matters for this to be true.

So if someone is gaslighting without intending it and someone is being gaslighted without intending it, then where is the locus of RESPONSIBILITY in the engagement?

What's interesting is, the same thing can be applied to microaggressions or any other morally important topics of today where people can have very different experiences of INTENT vs IMPACT without a real way to verify intent and without a real way to verify impact (while assuming that whoever speaks of impact would never say so with an intent to harm)

So how do we resolve these differences in relative experiences?

(click the title to read more)

Comment

Setting Up Leadership for Success Around Sex, Love, and Power

Comment

Setting Up Leadership for Success Around Sex, Love, and Power

This feels like a great starting point for any leader out there wanting to set things up for better leadership with their community around their own personal need for sex & love and how their position can impact others. I know I've had to engage with many of the points below as a leader/facilitator/teacher myself.

Leadership can't happen alone, so having a team to support this effort is crucial and much needed. I believe that this is greatly understated in our current paradigm where we perceive leaders to be separate entities from us rather than individuals who need support for their leadership to be effective and safe(r). To believe "it's their fault and responsibility and they need to be accountable" completely absolves us from responsibility while at the same time asking us to "do something about this" which is just another way to displace responsibility to them while at the same time feeling good about doing something.

The better approach is to show up where something is missing and bring in what is missing.

That's what teamwork is.

Here goes:

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached

Comment

A Love Letter to the Anxiously Attached

by Crystallin Dion

My dear,

When you meet someone you really like, and when they make it clear that they really like you back, that's one of the best feelings ever (I get it). But if we’re being honest, you can sometimes be a bit quick to get physical, even to get sexual. Quick to be in a lot of communication, to spend a lot of time together, to use the language of “we, us, and our,” and “boyfriend” or “girlfriend." Quick to “choose” them, to call it a relationship, or partnership, or even love, and to peer all the way into a long and happy (imagined) future together.

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Unless You Live Under a Rock, Shadow is in Your Face And All Up in Your Business -- and You Blame Others for it.

Comment

Unless You Live Under a Rock, Shadow is in Your Face And All Up in Your Business -- and You Blame Others for it.

by Philippe Lewis

But don't just take my word for it.

I love articles about the "Love and Light" spiritual bypass crap that goes from the indirect bypass/shaming/guilting/shunning all the way to the loud "calling out" of anyone that doesn't behave with pure "love and light" in their heart. 

Well, I've got news for you: unless you've lived under a rock (or in cave, how spiritually romantic), and were raised by the perfect parents (which simply don't exist), then as you've circled the sun you've come to realize that you're not only living in a REAL and GRITTY world, you're also likely accumulated shadow/shit/stuff faster than you can integrate it. And if not you, then the people around you who you have to live with, deal with and be in relationship with. 

Click the title to read the rest.

Read on by clicking the title!

Comment